Custom Search
News
International
United Kingdom
United States
Sport
Entertainment
Internet
Science / Tech

Features
Articles
Notices
Editorial
Submissions

2010
January

The Dark Age
Nov 06 - Dec 09

2006
October
September
April
March
February
January

2005
December
October
September
May
April
February
January

2004
December
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January

2003
November
October
September
August
July
June
May
April
March
February
January

2002
December
November




Hosted by
2f3 Internet

More Humour
BBspot
The Bentinel
Big Fib
Broken Newz
The Daily Bull
Deadbrain UK
Deadbrain US
Faux Newz
The Fake News
Glossy News
The Hammer
I-Mockery
KTAB News
Muskrat News
News Hax
No Apologies Press
On The John
Perplexing Times
Rant Morgan
Satirium
Social Scrutiny
The Specious Report
Studio 8
The Toque
Trepanning
US Press
The Voice of Reason UK
The Voice of Reason US
Watley Review
Weekly Canard

Music Sites
Sonar Radar
BeatEd.com
Green Plastic
No Through Road
>> News > International News
World’s Media Disappointed No Major Landmarks Were Destroyed In Madrid Attacks - March 12th 2004

The World’s Media has expressed its disappointment in the lack of damage to iconic world structures following the Terrorist Attacks in Madrid. The attacks on the Spanish capital cost the lives of 190 people, one of the largest terrorist attacks since September 11th, with fatalities expected to rise over the coming days.

However, the news coverage paled in comparison to the New York attacks. Whilst it made headline news around the globe, TV schedules remained largely unchanged, and the British tabloids still featured their usual indulgences into Jordan, David Beckham and speaking out against Speed Cameras.

Media analyst Keith Wilson was quick to explain as to why this had happened:

“With the World Trade Center attacks not only was the death toll much higher, but it had a far more high scale profile all round. It featured aeroplanes crashing, multiple explosions and destruction and damage to world famous landmarks in two major cities.

“People might say the reason for the coverage is due to the difference in the death tolls, but in the end the numbers killed are irrelevant. Was it not Stalin who said ‘One death is a tragedy, one million deaths is a statistic? Based on that logic, the Madrid attack is far worse as 190 is closer to one and 3,000 is closer to a million.

“No, the most important factor in the attacks comes down to the lack of landmark buildings destroyed. With September 11th you could justify stopping Eastenders and televising the attacks – I mean how cool is it watching some skyscrapers explode. Sure people are dying, but people forget that when they are watching TVs.

“When Concorde crashed – we stopped the regular TV shows for that. That was just over 100 people killed in an accident not an attack. Why was this far more news worthy? Because a rare aeroplane had been destroyed.

“However, show a train on fire and all they’ll think of is all of the natural train disasters, well I mean the ones that don’t involve terrorist parties. Unless you count the Conservatives as a terrorist party in which case pretty much all the British train crashes are somehow down to them.”

Other factors that have been suggested include the fact that it was not based in America. With America responsible for influencing an overwhelming percentage of Television material, the fact the Spanish attacks lacked an American connection severely limited its marketability. However, Mr Wilson explained to use that marketability it ultimately what killed the story:

“Terrorist attacks on a major city? It’s been done. The IRA started the trend attacking London and Al-Qaeda made it big with 9/11. People are losing interest, the Madrid attacks have proved that terrorist attacks are just no longer fashionable amongst today's television audience.”

Click to share this page on:
Disclaimer: Random Perspective accepts no responsibility for your believing of anything on this website.

The content on this website is satirical and thus many reports are unsubstantiated and therefore should not be considered factual. The use of major brands and corporations is used in good humour in order to improve the impact of the writing. Under no circumstances should you believe anything that could be considered defamatory without first checking it against a major news source.

IMPORTANT: If you do not appreciate or understand this article please consult your doctor as your right ventromedial prefrontal cortex is impaired.
Latest News
Shocking Image Confirms UKIP's Claims That Immigration Has Left Parts of Britain Unrecognisable

Santa Unveils Drone Fleet To Revolutionize Christmas Present Delivery in 2013

British and American Government Reach Consensus on Math vs Maths Debate

Yahoo Staff Hope Marissa Mayer's Love For Baking Ends Soon

Is Apple's WWDC the Star Trek Convention of the 21st Century?



Related Topics:
WAR ON TERROR!


Related Articles
Marlboro Submits Alternative Design For Replacement World Trade Center

Real Madrid to move to Beckingham Palace

Osama Bin Laden Streaks through Washington DC









Do you like this website?
Please let me know your opinions by emailing me or contacting me via MSN on BenDickson@Hotmail.com

Random Perspective: News, Satire and Humour.
Random Stuff for those who read this far: Oak Worktops and Walnut Worktops, Bespoke Designer Kitchens, Fruit Videos, FruitVideos Blog, Norfolk Wedding Photography, and Lowestoft Estate Agent